Big News!

My latest post for Alpha Baskets is posted and includes the following; I’ve disclosed many times that the portfolio I manage for clients is mostly a mix of individual issues and narrower ETFs. If you do anything remotely similar, how have you done this year? How have each of your holdings done? How has the overall equity portion of your portfolio done in relation to the roughly 16% gain for the S&P 500? Please click through to read the entire post. If you haven’t heard, I am also blogging at a relatively new site called TheMaven. I have quite a few posts up. This is my home page which is a good place to start. Please consider registering as a user and following my page. It is easy, doesn’t cost anything and can be done through Facebook if that is easier. Last December in Malibu. Red Sox at the Mariners last July. Trophy Truck from last...

Bitcoin, To Infinity & Beyond!

The weekly Market Update is posted and includes the following; A couple of days ago, Bespoke reported that the tech sector had grown to 24.7% of the S&P 500. Sector weightings can be very constructive for warning of trouble ahead. In 2000 of course tech grew to more than 30% of the index which preceded a 50% decline. Then in 2007 the financial sector grew to about 20% of the S&P 500 which preceded a 50% decline. Twenty-25% in tech might not be problematic the way 20% in some other sectors might be but growing to 30% would be very concerning as an expression of some form of excess in the market that is likely to be corrected. Last week we mentioned a reformulating of the telecom sector to take in media and entertainment companies which could easily result the tech sector dropping from 25% of the S&P 500 to as low as less than 20%as some of the largest names in the sector are due to be reclassified. This creates something of a dilemma for watchers of sector weightings…unless a bear market starts before the change happens. An excess, to the extent there is one, wouldn’t simply be erased by reshuffling the deck. Please click through to read the entire update. I have some very exciting news. In addition to my blogging with AdvisorShares I have also started blogging at themaven.net. This link is my first post and explains in more detail what I will be doing but the short version is it will be more like how Random Roger first started out. This link is to my...

A Financial Advisor Has Got To Know His Limitations

Lots to cover today with a hat tip to Abnormal Returns for these links. First is an admonition to financial advisors to stay in their lane and not get into life coaching. After reading the article I concluded the article isn’t completely right, but it isn’t completely wrong either. What this really is about is knowing your own limitations and understanding when appropriately generic encouragement crosses the line to something that requires proper training and probably some form of licensure. The article looks at a couple of empty platitudes as being potentially harmful like “be the best you can be.” I would consider some more specific examples of veering out of your lane. An easy example is something dietary. “It’s usually a good idea to cut back on sugar” is one thing, having no medical training but advising someone start a ketogenic diet and creating a meal plan for them is something else. Another good example is with exercising. I have been on enough medical calls as an EMT to know that everyone has some sort of medical issue(s) and giving bad exercise advice for ot knowing someone’s medical history is very easy to do. Financial advisors aren’t necessarily CPAs, they are certainly two different disciplines. My work as an advisor means I often have a good sense of what question to ask as I imagine would many advisors but getting in too deep risks hurting the client. Sorry about that doesn’t cut it where taxes are concerned. The Wall Street Journal gave a checklist of things to consider when choosing where to live in retirement. It is a...

A Lot of Market Stuff & the Maui Invitational!

This week’s Market Update is posted and includes the following; The spread between two year and ten year treasuries narrowed to 63 basis points last week (61 basis points this morning), keeping fears alive that we are on the way to an inversion. T. Rowe Price made some noise last week calling for the spread to zero out in 2018 with most of the narrowing coming from increases in Fed policy. The FOMC obviously understands the implication of an inverted curve (it’s recessionary because lending is no longer profitable) so something may have to give in terms of the FOMC stopping short or allowing the curve to invert if the market doesn’t bail them out with higher long rates. Please click through to read the entire update. In honor of the Maui Invitational, a couple of pictures from when I went in 2008 and...

Shiller Is Wrong

My latest post for Alpha Baskets is published and includes the following; According to ETF.com there are 58 ETFs focused on technology totaling about $70 billion. They all appear to be index funds or smart beta funds, but any use of these funds would clearly be part of an active strategy. Ditto any other sector funds or funds that are narrower than sectors. While someone might pushback on me that there is no passive strategy that uses tech sectors funds, what would be the passive use of a Chinese internet stock ETF be? Please click through to read the entire post. The Baja 1000 just ran and while I didn’t go, here are some the trucks that participated (my pictures are from the Mint 400 in...